Had a question from a TT owner about De-rating the tire load. He wanted to use P-Type tires on his trailer.
Can you explain why anyone would need to de-rate the weight rating just because a tire is used on a trailer? I don't understand why if the rating is 2510 lbs on one vehicle why wouldn't it be the same on another at the same pressure?
Now if you don't like the simple answer here is a longer approximation.
When tires are designed there are certain things that can be expected. First off they are expected to pass all the regulatory tests. Some of these tests will be at or near the tire's max rated load. None of these tests are for 60,000 miles but may only last 2,000 miles at the max when running in 100F temperature on a curved drum (which is much harder than running on flat surface) and the tire is never be allowed to cool down as it is also run at say 50 mph. Outdoor testing may be at 100% load and 30,000 miles but the test car does come to a stop for 30 min or so every few hours. The test track however has no sharp turns or pot holes.
If a tire can survive the above in all probability it can run 60,000 on regular highways BUT occasionally at higher speeds and with occasional pot holes etc. We know that there is a "reserve load" of say 10% to 20% between the tire's load capacity at the placard inflation in normal car operation and there may only be 10% or less of the time the tire is asked to run anywhere near it's max load.
Now if that same tire is put on a small pick up or SUV the % of the time it may be required to run at or near it's max load may be 50 % or more.
It was learned many years ago with the introduction of station wagons that if we were to avoid premature tire failures something needed to be done. At the time there were only passenger and true truck tires so the only option was to reduce the load allowed when the passenger tires were placed in station wagon service. Later on, when SUVs were invented they replaced station wagons in the market place so the definition of "Multi-purpose" vehicles was coined and since pick up trucks were "civilized" to be more like cars and less like trucks and occasionally passenger type tires were applied to these trucks. Again the percentage of time the tire was asked to operate at its max load capability was much greater than when the same tire was placed on a car.
The "de-rating" was established at a factor of 1.10
Now in reality early RV trailers were single axle but would spend an even greater portion of the time at their max load. To counter that their service life was much less so the 1.10 factor was applied to passenger tires in trailer service.
If you look at the rated load capacity of a true LT type tire vs a P type at the same inflation you will see that the LT is rated at about 25% lower load capacity. This is because vehicles that are expected to be used as trucks ie a major part of their life fully loaded, the reality of the physics involved dictates that if you want to get 40 to 60,000 mile life you must reduce the load. This lower capacity is one reason there is no De-Rating for LT tires when placed on trailers.
It may help if you think of tire life as a formula in the form of
LIFE = 100,000 - (A x %of time at 100%load) -(B x % of time at 90% load) - (C x % of time at 80% of max load)-(D x %of time at speed greater than 50 mph)- (E x % of time at speed greater than 65 mph)- (F x number of 4" deep pot holes) etc, etc, etc.
If you think of A, B C etc as large numbers such as 50,000 or 20,000 I think you can see that it is easy to "consume" the finite tire life of 100,000.
Now in reality there is no such formula as it would have hundreds for factors, each of which is almost impossible to establish without hundreds of thousands of dollars research.
Hope this helps you understand why the De-Rating formula for P Type tires when placed in "mult-purpose or trailer service is Load Max New = (Load Max on tire)/1.10
Subscribe to the weekly RVtravel.com newsletter or one of our other newsletters about RVing. Great information and advice. Now in our 14th year. Learn more or subscribe.
I wonder who thought a "derating" factor could be 1.10? Wouldn't a factor, if you wanted to call it a derating factor, more properly be 0.91?ReplyDelete